The technology and data architecture beneath the operating model: platform strategy, the build-buy-rent decision, core modernisation, and a delivery approach that avoids the big-bang. From enterprise architecture and a single data source of truth to a greenfield or multi-vendor build, governed so it stays coherent and free of lock-in.

Technology, data & platform architecture


WORK STAGES

  1. Read the estate and the goal.  Map the current architecture, the technical debt, and the run-versus-change split, and pin down what the business actually needs the technology to do.

  2. Set the target architecture.  A composable, decoupled design with clear domain boundaries, an open API gateway, and a data architecture built for a single source of truth, with the principles that keep it coherent.

  3. Decide build, buy, or rent.  Run every function against a hybrid procurement model, and a structured vendor evaluation to a verified shortlist, on jurisdiction, functional fit, cloud-native architecture, and predictable licensing.

  4. Prove it with a steel thread.  Build a thin, front-to-back slice through one product or segment, stage-gated, so the executive can judge real progress before committing to full migration.

  5. Scale without a big-bang.  Move in domain-driven waves, hollow the legacy core with a strangler approach, and govern a multi-vendor build through a single design authority that holds the blueprint.

  6. Assure it, in or out of the room.  An independent read of a programme, inherited or in-flight, against schedule, budget, architecture, and the gaps carried in from due diligence.

KEY AREAS OF ASSISTANCE

  • Most of the technology run cost goes to keeping legacy alive, leaving little for change.

  • A core platform is holding the business back: releases take months, data is locked in proprietary formats, and personalisation or open integration is out of reach.

  • A major build or replacement is being planned, and the choice between building, buying, and renting is not clear.

  • A multi-vendor or greenfield build is stacking up integration risk and the threat of lock-in.

  • A programme is heading for a big-bang go-live, or has already stalled and overrun.

  • Data is fragmented across silos, blocking a single view of customer, cost, or risk.

  • An acquisition or carve-out needs its technology separated or integrated, with an independent assurance read.